Zum Hauptinhalt
Zum Blog

12 min read

Your remote workday deserves an ending

Germany has no statutory right to disconnect. That makes clear agreements - and a small shutdown ritual - more important.

Von Veronika Höller

Head of Demand Generation bei Tresorit · Autorin, Speakerin und Mentorin

Redaktionell geprüft: 2026-09-18

A laptop being closed at a kitchen table in the evening, a cup of tea beside it

What a day without an ending actually looks like

The laptop is still open while you're already at dinner. A message comes in, you glance at it - and suddenly you're back in work mode, even though the table is set and someone is trying to talk to you.

There is no moment when someone calls out 'that's it for today.' No one stands up, puts on a coat, walks out a door. The transition an office almost automatically provides has to be invented at home - and that's easy to forget, because it doesn't look like a special thing to arrange.

Many people only notice how tense they are in the evening: the mind feels full, but it's hard to say exactly with what. The work isn't visibly finished, it's just been set down at some point, unmarked.

This isn't a sign of poor self-organisation. It's the logical result of place, time and role no longer being separated by walls and commutes, but only by decisions you make yourself - decisions that, on a long day, are easy to postpone until last.

How common remote work really is

In 2024, 24% of employed people in Germany worked from home at least occasionally, compared with 13% in 2019. According to an ifo survey, employees spend on average around 17% of their working time at home.

In other words: what you're experiencing isn't a fringe phenomenon, it's daily life for a growing share of the workforce. The structures that used to guarantee an end to the day are missing not just for you but for many people at once - even though it's rarely discussed openly.

There is no statutory right to disconnect in Germany; the minimum rest periods of the Working Time Act apply. At EU level, a second-stage social partner consultation on the topic has been running since July 2025.

In practice, that means: as long as there's no binding legal boundary, the responsibility for a clear end to the workday rests more with you and with workplace agreements than with an outside rule you could simply point to.

Give open work somewhere to wait

Your mind holds on to tasks when it does not know where they will reappear tomorrow. Note what remains open and choose no more than three priorities for the next day.

That sounds simple, but it changes something important: a vague sense of 'there's still so much' becomes a concrete, bounded list you can look at and then set aside. A sheet of paper or an app is enough - what matters is that you'll find it again tomorrow morning.

Then check only whether anything is genuinely urgent. Not everything unread is urgent. An unread chat icon creates pressure, but it doesn't actually tell you whether a reply is needed tonight.

Some people also write themselves a single sentence for the next morning: 'First priority is X.' That removes the lingering aftertaste of the workday, because the mind knows the matter hasn't been lost - it has a fixed place waiting for it.

  • What can wait until tomorrow?
  • What is tomorrow's first priority?
  • What status do you want others to see?
  • What would happen if you only read that message tomorrow morning?

Make the transition physical

Close work apps and leave the workspace if you can - even if that means changing chairs or stepping outside briefly. The body needs a signal the brain can register, and a single click often isn't enough on its own.

Some people close the laptop with a deliberate, audible click; others move the screen out of view; others take a short walk around the block. It doesn't need to be a grand gesture - what matters is that it happens the same way each day, so it becomes a reliable cue.

If you work in the same room where you spend your evenings, it helps to at least put the work materials away: laptop closed, notes in a drawer, cables coiled up. The room shouldn't look like an office anymore in the evening, even if it was one during the day.

A ritual cannot solve structural overload. If constant availability is expected, a clear agreement with your manager or team is also needed - no shutdown ritual, however good, replaces a boundary that isn't respected from the outside.

Availability is an agreement, not a personality trait

Many people experience constant availability as something about themselves - as if they 'just can't say no.' More often, though, it's simply never been discussed when someone is expected to be reachable and when not.

It helps to clarify this actively rather than leave it to guesswork. A sentence like 'I'm available until 6pm, after that I read messages the next morning unless it's genuinely urgent' gives everyone a clear rule to work with.

The question of what counts as 'urgent' is also worth a short team discussion: does it mean a phone call, a message flagged as urgent, or can any message be treated that way by default? Without that clarification, every incoming message becomes a potential exception.

Agreements like this can feel formal or overdone at first. In practice, they're relieving for exactly that reason - the decision 'do I answer now or not' no longer has to be made alone, every single time.

  • Until what time are you actually reachable for your team?
  • How would you define 'urgent' for your team?
  • Who would you need to have this explicit conversation with?

How to raise the boundary without justifying it

Naming a boundary often feels like it needs an apology attached. In reality, a short, matter-of-fact sentence usually does the job without any explanation or justification.

For example: 'I close out my workday at 6pm and I'm reachable again the next morning. If something is genuinely urgent, please call me.' That states the boundary and the way around it for real exceptions, in one breath.

With a manager, it might sound like: 'I'd like to clarify how we handle availability outside core hours, so we both have the same expectation.' That's an invitation to a conversation, not a complaint.

If the response is dismissive or irritated, that says more about the existing expectations on the team than about the reasonableness of your request. A clear, repeatable phrase is usually more effective than one long explanation.

When the household has a say

At home, work time and household time constantly overlap - the washing machine that runs in between, a child arriving from daycare at midday, a delivery at the door during a meeting. This overlap is real and can't simply be organised away.

It also means that 'end of the workday' often doesn't mean the day is actually over - it means shifting into unpaid care work: cooking dinner, helping with homework, folding laundry. The transition from paid work to unpaid work is far less visible than the transition to actual rest.

It can help to name that difference explicitly - not 'done for the day' in the sense of finished with everything, but specifically 'done with paid work' - with the awareness that another part of the day, one that also needs attention, may be starting.

If more than one person lives in the household, a short conversation about whose workday ends when, and who is responsible for what afterwards, is worth having. Without it, the person who 'looks done first' often ends up carrying the bulk of what follows.

  • Where do work time and household time overlap most for you?
  • What does 'end of the day' actually mean for you - end of paid work, or end of all tasks?
  • Who do you need to talk to about who's responsible for what, and when?

What to watch out for: feeling you must constantly prove yourself

When you're not visibly present in an office, it's tempting to replace that presence with availability instead: answering fast, staying online in the evening, treating the green status dot as proof that you're there and working. That's productivity theatre - it shows activity, not impact.

Over time, this is exhausting and says little. No one benefits from you being online at 9pm if the actual task was already finished at 4pm. It just keeps pushing the line between work and personal time further out.

If you notice you're staying online in the evening 'so it's visible,' it's worth asking exactly what that's meant to achieve - and whether a short, honest update the next morning wouldn't have the same effect without costing you the evening.

A firm end to the day is not a retreat from responsibility. It's the condition for being able to think clearly again the next day - and that serves the work far better, in the long run, than constant online presence.

One small next step

You don't need to build a perfect system right away. Pick a single small ritual for the coming week: close the laptop audibly at a fixed time, jot down three open items for tomorrow, or step outside for five minutes before the evening begins.

Afterwards, notice without judging what changes - not whether it 'worked,' but how the transition actually felt. Small, repeatable rituals usually only become noticeable after a few days.

If you realise the real issue isn't your ritual but the expectation of constant availability, that's an important insight in its own right. At that point, the next step isn't another ritual - it's a conversation.

Quellen

  1. 24% of employed people in Germany worked from home in 2024Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) · 2025
  2. Employees spend 17 percent of their working time at homeifo Institute · 2024
  3. Consultation on the right to disconnect and fair teleworkEuropean Commission Representation in Germany · 2025

Über die Autorin

Veronika Höller · Head of Demand Generation bei Tresorit · Autorin, Speakerin und Mentorin

Veronika Höller ist Head of Demand Generation bei Tresorit, Autorin, Speakerin und leidenschaftliche Mentorin. Seit über 18 Jahren arbeitet sie im digitalen Marketing und verbindet strategisches Denken mit praktischer Erfahrung in PPC, SEO und Demand Generation.

Im Mentoring steht für sie der Mensch im Mittelpunkt. Sie unterstützt Menschen dabei, ihre Stärken zu erkennen, neue Perspektiven zu entwickeln und ihren eigenen Weg zu gehen - unabhängig von Jobtitel oder bisherigem Werdegang. Dabei geht es nicht darum, fertige Antworten zu liefern, sondern gemeinsam Lösungen zu finden, Selbstvertrauen aufzubauen und ins Handeln zu kommen.