12 min read
Staying visible without becoming someone else
Quieter people are evaluated differently. What that means for updates, feedback and remote work.
Von Veronika Höller
Head of Demand Generation bei Tresorit · Autorin, Speakerin und Mentorin
Redaktionell geprüft: 2026-09-18

What invisibility feels like day to day
You finished a piece of work cleanly and on time, but in the next team meeting the conversation is all about a different project - one where someone asked several follow-up questions and shared progress updates along the way. Your work simply doesn't come up, even though it's done.
In an office, you might have mentioned what you were working on in passing, by the coffee machine. Remotely, that side channel disappears entirely. There's no more accidental moment where work becomes visible unless you actively make it visible.
For quieter people, actively making work visible often feels uncomfortable - like advertising yourself when you'd rather just talk about the substance. That discomfort is often exactly why people skip it altogether.
The result: you deliver reliably, but you're less often considered for promotions, interesting projects or recognition - not because the work is worse, but because no one connects it to a name.
An evaluation effect, not a personal deficit
Across three studies, introverted employees were rated lower in warmth and competence than extraverted ones, regardless of the rater's own personality. Visibility and performance are easily confused.
That's an important relief: it isn't that introverted or quieter people actually perform less well or are less competent. It's a systematic perception pattern that shows up regardless of who's doing the evaluating.
Working remotely offers fewer incidental chances to correct that impression. That is a reason for short, regular updates - not for constant self-promotion.
The distinction matters: this isn't about playing a more extraverted version of yourself. It's about deliberately giving the missing incidental visibility a small, reliable counterpart.
Report change, not activity
A brief update works better when it describes change rather than listing tasks: what was decided, what is different now, what you need next.
For example: instead of 'I worked on the client presentation,' something like 'The client presentation is done, feedback was positive, we can start implementation by the end of the week' works better. The second version shows impact; the first only shows activity.
On feedback, the classic meta-analysis by Kluger and DeNisi found that feedback improved performance on average, yet decreased it in more than a third of cases - especially when it directed attention to the person rather than the task. So ask for feedback on the work, not on you.
A useful phrasing: 'Could you take a look at this and tell me whether it meets the requirements?' is more concrete and less exposing than 'What do you think of my work?' - and it usually gets you a more useful answer, too.
- What changed because of my work this week?
- Which decision is pending and who needs it?
- Who do I want to keep in the loop?
- How could I ask for feedback on the work rather than on myself?
What an update can actually look like
A regular update doesn't need to be long. Three sentences are often enough: what's finished, what's in progress, and where you need something from others. A fixed rhythm - say, every Friday afternoon - takes the self-promotional edge off any single message, because it's simply part of the routine.
For people who find writing easier than speaking spontaneously in meetings, a short written channel - a team chat message, a shared document - is often a better fit than a verbal contribution made under time pressure.
Reaching out to individual people directly can also help: 'Just wanted to let you know X is done, in case that's relevant for your project.' That's not showing off - it's simply information that would otherwise be lost.
What matters is finding the format that fits how you actually work, rather than training yourself into a louder presence that doesn't feel like you. Reliability and clarity tend to build more credibility over time than volume does.
Building relationships remotely without forcing small talk
Getting to know colleagues often happens in passing in an office - in the hallway, by the coffee machine, waiting for the lift. Remotely, this needs a little more intention, without needing to feel forced.
A short, unstructured virtual conversation with no agenda - fifteen minutes, a coffee in front of the screen - can fill that gap, as long as it doesn't turn into an obligation. Some teams schedule this deliberately; others let it happen informally.
Relationships also grow through the quality of interactions, not just their frequency: a genuine question about how someone is doing after a stressful project, or a short note of feedback on an idea, signals real interest more than generic small talk does.
If you find groups draining, you can focus on maintaining a few individual relationships rather than trying to stay evenly present across the whole team. One or two reliable connections on a team often carry more weight than many shallow ones.
- Who on your team haven't you spoken to directly in a while?
- Which form of connecting feels least draining for you?
- What would you genuinely like to know about a colleague's work?
Boundaries at home as part of your own visibility
Visibility isn't only about showing results - it also means clearly communicating your own working hours and availability. If you don't, others may fill in the gap with assumptions, such as that you're reachable around the clock because you're 'home anyway.'
A short note in a calendar or status - 'In childcare until 9am, reachable after that' - clarifies more than it might seem. It also helps normalise the fact that working from home doesn't mean being permanently available.
In mixed households, where more than one person works from home or looks after children, it helps to make these boundaries explicit not just to a team but within the household too - otherwise the interruption tends to default to whoever is perceived as 'more flexible.'
Clear boundaries don't come across as unprofessional. If anything, they signal that someone organises their work and can be relied on - which itself feeds into the perception of competence that's harder to convey remotely.
When isolation becomes the real issue
Sometimes the underlying issue isn't primarily about visibility to others, but a more basic sense of being cut off from the work and the team. Days can go by where you haven't spoken to anyone beyond short chat messages.
That's not a minor thing. A lack of informal exchange also means a lack of reassurance - you're less likely to know whether you're on the right track, whether your read on a situation is shared, or whether you still 'belong' at all.
If that feeling persists, it can help to name it openly rather than carry it alone - whether with a manager, a trusted colleague, or someone outside work. Isolation is rarely solved by better self-organisation alone.
If isolation is accompanied over time by exhaustion, low motivation or persistent low mood, that's a signal that goes beyond a scheduling or communication fix - professional support is the more appropriate path at that point, not another update format.
What to watch out for: constantly proving yourself and productivity theatre
The worry of appearing invisible can easily tip into its opposite: constant online presence, an above-average number of messages, a sense that every task needs documenting to 'count.' That's exhausting, and usually not as convincing as it feels.
Productivity theatre - showing activity instead of delivering results - is often noticed by attentive colleagues and managers, and tends to read as insecurity rather than competence over time. It doesn't substitute for actual impact.
The difference between a helpful update and self-promotion often comes down to purpose: does the message inform someone of something they need, or is it mainly there to show you're busy? That question is worth asking before hitting send.
A calm, reliable rhythm of updates is more convincing in the long run than sporadic, attention-grabbing activity. Trust builds through repetition, not volume.
One small next step
You don't need to become a different person on your team starting tomorrow. Pick one small habit: a short weekly update to your team, a message to someone you haven't spoken to in a while, or a more precise phrasing the next time you ask for feedback.
Notice how it feels and what comes of it - not immediately in the form of a promotion or praise, but in the form of responses, follow-up questions, and being included in conversations you weren't part of before.
If you notice that isolation or a lack of feedback is a bigger, ongoing issue, an honest conversation with your manager or professional support is a more useful next step than trying yet another format.
Quellen
- Introversion and perceptions of warmth and competence at workMcCord, Occupational Health Science · 2025
- The Effects of Feedback Interventions on Performance: A Historical Review and a Meta-AnalysisKluger & DeNisi, Psychological Bulletin · 1996
Über die Autorin
Veronika Höller · Head of Demand Generation bei Tresorit · Autorin, Speakerin und Mentorin
Veronika Höller ist Head of Demand Generation bei Tresorit, Autorin, Speakerin und leidenschaftliche Mentorin. Seit über 18 Jahren arbeitet sie im digitalen Marketing und verbindet strategisches Denken mit praktischer Erfahrung in PPC, SEO und Demand Generation.
Im Mentoring steht für sie der Mensch im Mittelpunkt. Sie unterstützt Menschen dabei, ihre Stärken zu erkennen, neue Perspektiven zu entwickeln und ihren eigenen Weg zu gehen - unabhängig von Jobtitel oder bisherigem Werdegang. Dabei geht es nicht darum, fertige Antworten zu liefern, sondern gemeinsam Lösungen zu finden, Selbstvertrauen aufzubauen und ins Handeln zu kommen.